It’s Deaf, Not ‘Hearing Impaired’: Unpacking How This Label Misshapes, Harms, And Challenges Deaf Identity—And How We Can Change This

Introduction to Deaf Identity and Labels

In this blog post we will explore Deaf Identity through the examination of the label “hearing impaired” which is often assigned to Deaf people.   The term “hearing impaired” has consequences as it imposes meanings, expectations, and misconceptions that put the focus on the person’s inability rather than their identity and capabilities.  Misunderstandings about this label can lead to confusion, miscommunication, and even disrespect. 

Identity vs. Label

The concepts of Identity and labels are closely intertwined but differ in several key aspects.

Identity is a deeply personal, internal construct that evolves over time, encompassing an individual’s sense of self across personal, social, and cultural dimensions.  Identity is shaped by experiences, beliefs, and personal choices, providing a sense of continuity that guides behaviors and interactions.

Labels are descriptors often assigned by society to categorize people based on traits and behaviors. These labels are laden with meanings and expectations which can influence a person’s identity and sense of belonging. Although they may simplify complex human characteristics for easier communication, they can lead to stereotyping and misrepresentation. Think  “differently abled” vs “handicapped”, Blind vs “visually impaired” or, as we will examine here, Deaf vs “hearing impaired”. 

Problems with the Label “Hearing Impaired”

Hearing people often assume that the label “hearing impaired” is a polite term that is inclusive and universally accepted. Here’s why it’s not:

Generates Perceptions of Deficiency and Dependency

Meaning:  The term “hearing impaired” emphasizes what people cannot do – hear – rather than recognizing their full range of abilities and identity. This can reinforce a deficit-oriented view where the individual is seen primarily in terms of their hearing loss rather than their whole self.

Expectation: There may be an assumption that someone labeled as “hearing impaired” requires help, whether in communication, navigating daily activities, or in educational and professional settings. This can lead to patronizing attitudes or unnecessary assistance, undermining the person’s independence.

Misconception:  The label “hearing impaired” often leads people to think that the individual’s hearing loss directly limits their ability to perform certain tasks or communicate effectively. This can create an image of dependency or a need for accommodation, whether true or not for the individual.

Produces Medicalization of Identity:

Meaning: The term “hearing impaired” suggests that the hearing loss is a physical condition or disability that might require medical treatment or intervention, such as hearing aids, cochlear implants, or other assistive devices.

Expectation: The label “hearing impaired” can create an expectation that a person’s abilities are limited to what they can hear, influencing perceptions in educational, professional, and social contexts. This can lead to lower expectations in terms of performance, involvement, and contribution.

Misconception: The label “hearing impaired” frames deafness primarily as a medical condition to be treated or mitigated, rather than as a cultural or linguistic identity. This medical perspective can overshadow the social and cultural dimensions of being Deaf.

Develops Paternalism

Meaning:  There’s an assumption that communicating with someone who is “hearing impaired” will require different approaches than those used with hearing individuals. This might include speaking loudly, clearly, or using visual aids or gestures.

Expectation: There is often an expectation that individuals who are “hearing impaired” should seek or have sought medical treatment to “correct” their hearing, such as using hearing aids or pursuing cochlear implants, regardless of the individual’s personal or cultural preferences.

Misconception: There’s often an implied paternalism in the term “hearing impaired,” suggesting that individuals with hearing loss are in need of fixing or help from those who can hear. This can undermine the autonomy and self-determination of Deaf individuals and communities.

By addressing the problems with the term “hearing impaired,”  we can begin to foster a greater understanding and respect for the Deaf community’s preferences and identities. It’s important to ask individuals how they identify and to use those terms in our interactions. This not only respects their identity but also promotes a more inclusive and understanding environment.

Deaf Identity Explained

Let’s now explore Deaf identity more deeply to understand why the term “Deaf” is preferred over “hearing impaired.”

Deaf identity is a unique and profound sense of self that encompasses much more than the absence of hearing. It involves a rich cultural heritage, shared language, and a vibrant community that values communication and connection. For many Deaf individuals, their identity is closely tied to their use of ASL (American Sign Language) and their participation in the Deaf community, which offers a distinct social network, cultural norms, and values that differ significantly from the hearing world.

This identity is not merely about the biological characteristic of not hearing; it is about belonging to a linguistic minority that has its own customs, history, and ways of interacting with the world. The Deaf community celebrates its achievements, cherishes its heritage, and fosters a sense of pride and solidarity among its members. Central to Deaf culture is the concept of “Deaf gain,” a perspective that frames Deafness as a form of diversity and enrichment rather than a disability. This view contrasts sharply with the medical model’s implication that being Deaf is a condition needing correction.

By understanding Deaf identity, we can better appreciate why terms like “hearing impaired” do not resonate with many in the community. These terms fail to acknowledge the full and rich lives Deaf people lead and do not reflect the positive affirmations of their cultural identity. As we explore the nuances of Deaf identity further, we recognize the importance of language that aligns with and respects the community’s self-defined identity, promoting an inclusive approach that honors their rich culture.

Actions You Can Take to Help Eliminate the Use of “Hearing Impaired”

Here are some practical steps you can take to help phase out the use of “hearing impaired” and promote a more respectful dialogue that utilizes the term Deaf.

Educate Yourself and Others

Knowledge is a powerful tool. Educate yourself about Deaf culture, ASL, and the preferences of the Deaf community. Attend workshops, read books, and watch documentaries produced by Deaf creators. Share this knowledge with friends, family, and colleagues to spread awareness about the appropriate terminology and the reasons behind it.

Advocate for Inclusive Language Policies

Work with local organizations, schools, workplaces, and government bodies to review and revise policies that refer to the Deaf community. Advocate for the use of “Deaf” in official documents and communications, explaining the significance of this term in respecting Deaf identity.

Support Deaf Media and Artists

Support Deaf creators, artists, and media outlets that portray the Deaf community authentically. By promoting and engaging with content that accurately represents Deaf experiences, you help elevate the voices of those who can best convey their own experiences.

Correct Misuse Politely

When you encounter the term “hearing impaired” being used, take a gentle approach to educate the speaker about why “Deaf” is preferred. Offer resources or explanations that can help them understand the impact of their word choices.

Engage in Social Media Advocacy

Use your social media platforms to advocate for the correct use of Deaf-related terminology. Share posts, infographics, and videos that educate about Deaf culture and the preferred language. Follow and amplify Deaf advocates and organizations that are working towards greater awareness and inclusion.

Encourage Representation

Support initiatives and programs that promote Deaf representation in all areas of society, from educational materials to entertainment media. Representation matters, and seeing Deaf individuals in diverse roles helps challenge stereotypes and change perceptions.

Participate in Community Events

Attend Deaf community events, if open to the public, to better understand and connect with the culture. Participation also shows your support for the community and provides opportunities to practice using the correct terminology in real-world interactions.

By taking these actions, you not only respect the identity and preferences of Deaf individuals but also contribute to a broader cultural shift towards inclusion and respect. Every step we take to use language thoughtfully helps build a world that recognizes and celebrates the diversity of human experiences.

Conclusion

In our exploration of Deaf identity and the problematic label of “hearing impaired,” we’ve seen how this term misrepresents and limits the Deaf community.  The label “hearing impaired” focuses on deficits rather than their rich cultural identity. By adopting the term “Deaf,” we honor diversity and emphasize capabilities over perceived limitations. Let’s commit to using language that respects and is more reflective of the Deaf community, promoting a more inclusive society.

Start today—change a word, change a mindset, change a life

Now that you are aware of the importance of using respectful and accurate terminology for the Deaf community, take action by educating others, supporting Deaf-led initiatives, and using your platforms to advocate for change. Commit to these efforts and help foster a society that fully recognizes and appreciates the diversity and richness of Deaf culture.